Speed applies to playback on this device only - the cast receiver ignores it.
Narrated with ElevenLabs. Save it in the app to listen offline.
The book in one minute
An owner can have the sums right and still be caught out by people: the customer who goes quiet, the supplier who digs in, the employee who does what the sheet says and nothing more, and their own judgement by Thursday afternoon. Successful Business Psychology, the second book of the Successful Business series, says everyone involved runs the same few mental shortcuts, and that the mind you can do most about is the one you read worst, your own.
Then it grades itself. Built by setting the library's summaries of 21 books against one another, it files the psychology business people like to quote under use it, test it or stop saying it, and it names who was studied. It promises no revenue result, and none of its sources put any of this to a test in a small business.
Your shortcuts mostly serve you well. They fail when the trigger arrives without the thing it stands for, and in an owner's week that can happen with nobody faking anything.
This is the library's own book. The AIEIO Library publishes the series and its editors set the labels. The book's rule here is The Seller's Higher Bar: anyone with something to sell owes you more proof. That settles nothing about truth and tells you how hard to push, so push on this page too.
How the book thinks
The book's idea is one machine, four seats, and the way in is the bad week it opens on. Nadia sees A$31,000 in her banking app and breathes out, though customers have paid her far more than that for visits not yet made. Elena is told to hold her nerve by a man whose card says Senior Growth Adviser. Tony writes his father's order for a street gone quiet. Helen calls a late payer sorted because he smiled. Each took one feature of a situation as the answer to all of it.
Nadia's pool service, Elena's music school, Tony's fruit shop and Helen's steel fabrication shop sit in Port Cardew, which the book invents along with every business and person in it. The figures are illustrative and the stories prove nothing.
The machine is the same few parts in every head. The first is the shortcut, which Robert Cialdini calls click, whirr: one feature, the trigger, gets taken as a sample of the whole. Many triggers are proxies, standing in for a substance you care about, as a title does for expertise, a balance for solvency and a smile for a promise. The shortcut fails when proxy and substance come apart, and that needs no villain, as Nadia's own prepaid plan shows. The other parts are loss aversion, where a loss hurts roughly twice as much as the same gain pleases; anchoring, where an early figure pulls your estimate towards it; framing, where wording changes how a fact lands; the gap between the planner who decides and the doer who has to act; and cue and reward.
A seat is the position a mind holds at a given moment, and the book starts in yours, following Robert Greene's strongest move: the traits he describes belong to you before they belong to anyone else. Those around you can usually name the pattern you keep repeating, and you usually cannot. A finding about customers is still no finding about staff. Loss aversion has no source for the team seat, so rewording a bonus as something to lose is guessing with other people's pay.
Labels belong to claims, never whole books. Well supported covers arithmetic, reasoning that needs no study and large replicated bodies of work. Mixed means the direction holds, with doubt over the size or the reach. Anecdotal or weak means nobody has checked, which the book insists is no insult. All three grade mechanisms, not business results, so a claim can read weaker in Successful Business Patterns, Book 1 of the series, which labels the two separately. A few claims the library rates highly on commercial experience, with no figure or named study, stop at Mixed here.
When a claim reaches you, the book's habit is to ask:
- 1Who measured it?How often you have heard something shows how well it travels, and nothing more.
- 2Who was studied?Moving a result from pension members or children to your counter is a transfer, and someone has to say so.
- 3Is the advice separate from the number?A dead figure says nothing against the advice beside it.
- 4What does being wrong cost?An afternoon needs no proof, and a bigger bill needs more.
- 5Who is selling?Do they know the field, what is in it for them if you believe them, and have you seen a mechanism or a result?
The series adds six questions of its own, each with a prediction that could fail, and rates them Anecdotal or weak at best: repeat and exit, truth, margin and cash, who decides, control, and cost of being wrong.
The four seats
Two chapters of machinery come first, then the seats, nearest to you first, each opening with a frank note on its evidence.
- 1Owner, Chapters 3 to 6Self-help and clinical observation, plus a few tested cores.
- 2Customer, Chapters 7 to 9The strongest science here, mostly old experiments whose effects shrank on a second look.
- 3Counterparty, Chapters 10 and 11The person on the other side of a deal, such as a landlord or a supplier. Craft from practitioners: the diagnosis is sound, and nobody has tested the technique.
- 4Team, Chapters 12 to 14The thinnest seat: a single factory illustration, some philosophy, and findings on children and students carried over.
The replication ledger
Replication means other researchers run a study again and see if the result returns. Chapter 2 shows how a weak number can reach your staff meeting without anybody having to lie: a small sample, flexible counting and unreported failures inflate it, a good story tends to set the language, and each retelling drops a caveat. The series' own reading, which it rates Anecdotal or weak, is that you pass it on because it flatters you. The replication ledger lists what happened when people checked.
Holds up, so use
Dull, and worth having.
All Well supported, in the people named.
Smaller than claimed, so test
A bet on a small effect, in the group named.
All Mixed: the direction has held, while the size is small, falling or disputed.
Do not cite
Retired, so no label.
Claims that did not hold up, each with what to say in its place.
Figures stay as rounded as the sources give them, and no entry was tested in a small business.
Holds up, so use
| Claim, and who was studied | What to believe |
|---|---|
| Defaults and automatic enrolment Pension members, in administrative records across countries | Well supported Participation rose from roughly half to roughly 90%, and hardly anyone opted out. |
| Removing sludge (friction between people and what is good for them) People using government programs | Well supported Take-up reliably rises, with nothing said about what a private firm gains. |
| Reminders People using government programs | Well supported A modest effect that shows up consistently. |
| Plans with a time and a place (implementation intentions, Peter Gollwitzer) Population not named | Well supported Reviews find it sizeable and dependable, usually quoted as roughly double the follow-through. It assumes you control your time, room and company, the book's control assumption. |
| Habit, context and friction (Wendy Wood) Individuals, no population named | Well supported Mainstream psychology, under the same control assumption. |
| Cue and reward Individuals | Well supported A century of learning theory, which nothing here extends to teams or whole firms. |
| Decisions run on shortcuts, and on loss, framing and fairness Largely lab volunteers, no single study named | Well supported Supports the diagnosis only. Any technique built on it must earn its own support. |
| Loss aversion A body of research, no population named | Well supported "Roughly twice" the weight of the same gain is a round number for people in general. |
| Self-monitoring Clinical use | Well supported An established technique, biased towards what is easy to record. By analogy, drop any record that makes you worse. |
| Rehearsal of motor skills Population not named | Well supported The skill measurably improves. Nobody has shown the same for conversations. |
| Earned secure attachment Parents and children | Well supported A parent's sense of their own history best predicts a child's security, more than the history itself. It goes no further, and it cannot sort staff or customers. |
| Reasoning and arithmetic No study needed | Well supported Small samples, flexible counting and unreported failures inflate results. Attention is paid for in money or time, a handful of tries settles little, and cash taken for work still to be done is a debt. |
Smaller than claimed, so test
| Claim, and who was studied | What to believe |
|---|---|
| Field nudges People in government trials | Mixed Several times smaller than in academic work, and near zero when one 2022 re-analysis of hundreds of studies corrected for bias. Test any wording change. |
| School growth mindset result About 12,000 students | Mixed In supportive schools the lower achievers picked up about a tenth of a grade point, and a 2023 re-analysis could not reliably separate the average from zero. That dispute is open, and no staff were studied. |
| Setback beliefs and process praise Children | Mixed The direction replicated, and praising ability can backfire in the short term. Applying it to adult owners or staff is a transfer. |
| Reciprocation and scarcity, as principles Almost entirely Western, educated, industrialised samples | Mixed The direction holds, and the size is uncertain. |
| Commitment and consistency Homeowners and others in small experiments, 1960s to 1980s | Mixed The direction holds, and the size is uncertain. |
| Social proof Almost entirely Western, educated, industrialised samples | Mixed A real effect with a false famous story. Messages telling people what most others do mostly come in below their published size. |
| Liking Lab volunteers, 1960s to 1980s | Mixed Five components of varying strength, with no firmer ranking on offer. |
| Obedience to symbols of authority Lab volunteers | Mixed Survives in a weakened form, with no finding about management. |
| Bystander effect and pluralistic ignorance Lab volunteers | Mixed Help gets less likely as witnesses increase, which replicates reasonably well in the lab. No source here measures it in a job meeting. |
| Anchoring Population not named | Mixed Decades of research, reported in Nudge, and no number. |
| Triggers in general, and classic-era compliance figures (the lawn sign and its kind) Small Western samples, 1960s to 1980s | Mixed Direction only: none of these percentages is a current effect size. The photocopier finding alone rates Anecdotal or weak, being one experiment in one queue. |
| The moves built on reciprocation, commitment and scarcity Students, homeowners and lab volunteers | Mixed The direction has held as a principle, and the size is open. In Chapter 11 these are moves made on you: know them, decline them, and never read them as a menu. |
Mixed for another reason. Here the evidence is strong in another field, or a basis is stated with no figures.
| Claim, and who was studied | What to believe |
|---|---|
| Defaults in customer settings No business trial reported | Mixed The evidence is strong but comes from another field, and it fits less well than it seems to. Assume no size for your business. |
| Planner and doer Pension members, in early trials | Mixed Fine as a concept. Reaching owners takes an analogy. |
| Avoiding temptation in place of resisting it Population not named | Mixed Said to rest on unnamed evidence other than willpower depletion. |
| Fault and responsibility, as a rule for your own next move Clinical settings, no study named | Mixed A stated basis in locus of control work, with no figure. |
| The free item as proof, and naming the buyer High-margin service firms, in commercial experience | Mixed Highly rated on reasoning, with no figure or named study. Naming the buyer is single voice, provisional. |
| Risk reversal No named group of buyers | Mixed The library rates it highly, on marketing literature and commercial experience, with no figure or named study, so the label stops here. Single voice, provisional. |
| Exit as Easy as Entry No group of customers studied | Mixed Library commentary, single voice. The reasoning is given, with no figure either way. |
| The person or room check (asking whether the setting, tools or management caused a problem before judging someone) Individuals arranging their own habits, and students in schools | Mixed Four voices, none tested at work. The business result stays Anecdotal or weak. |
Do not cite. These claims did not hold up, so they are retired and carry no label.
| The claim | Say this in its place |
|---|---|
| 7-38-55 as a general rule (a message is 7% words, 38% tone, 55% body language) | If words and tone disagree, go with the tone. |
| 21 days to form a habit | Lally 2009 put the median nearer 66 days, with a range from about 18 to over 250. Repetitions count for more than days. |
| One per cent daily gives 37 times (improve 1% a day for a year and finish 37 times better) | Small, steady changes build up, and not in a straight line. |
| Mindless-eating research (that people eat more from bigger containers without noticing) | Nothing. This claim did not hold up, and the book offers no replacement. |
| Milgram and Genovese as told (the obedience experiments and the 38 silent witnesses) | Only what the obedience and bystander entries above allow. |
| Willpower depletion | Drop the mechanism and keep the habit of avoiding temptation. |
| Nervous system cannot tell real from imagined (Maltz) | Rehearsal helps motor skill. Nobody has shown it extends to conversations. |
| Self-esteem drives performance | Quote only Mark Manson's critique, and say that large reviews, which the sources do not name, found no reliable cause. |
| Growth mindset training lifts staff or business performance | Quote the school result, and look at resourcing first. |
| Nudges at published size; social-norm messages as strong | Quote the field nudge entry, and say that structural defaults deliver. |
| Microexpressions, Pinocchio cues as proof, face reading (signs read as proof someone is lying or hiding something) | Go by track record. A long, intricate answer may earn a second look, and no more than that. |
| Generational segmentation; Laws 12 and 17 of The Laws of Human Nature (generational types and gender) | Nothing beyond the book's warning to leave them alone. Use neither on staff or customers. |
Everything else the book labels is Anecdotal or weak, meaning nobody has checked. The chapters below show the main claims by seat.
The first table is the plainest, and that is the finding: the series calls it "dull beats clever", then tells you to hold that loosely, since one set of editors graded everything. A retired claim proves nothing about its opposite.
The 14 chapters in brief
The pills are the book's own labels for each chapter's main claims, and none says a business result followed.
The machinery: Chapters 1 and 2
Chapter 1: One Machine, Four Seats
Everyone runs on shortcuts, and the chapter admits its own flaw: a long enough list of them can explain anything afterwards.
Cue and reward; decisions run on shortcuts, as a diagnosis Well supported
Triggers in general; planner and doer Mixed
You as the first target; applied people sense Anecdotal or weak
Chapter 2: The Replication Ledger
A weak finding can reach your staff meeting through a chain of reasonable people, each doing something small to it. The replication ledger goes bad if you cite a dead claim knowingly or use it to win a point.
Small samples, flexible counting and unreported failures inflate results Well supported
That you repeat a figure because it flatters you Anecdotal or weak
The owner seat: Chapters 3 to 6
Chapter 3: Will, Room or Belief
A slipping job has three possible explanations: you lack the force, the setting works against you, or a belief about yourself is steering. The best evidence is about a place and a time of day, and all it buys is a finished job.
Plans with a time and a place; habit, context and friction; rehearsal of motor skills Well supported
Avoiding temptation in place of resisting it; setback beliefs, in children Mixed
Action before motivation; reversed effort and over-effort; the supply ceiling Anecdotal or weak
Chapter 4: The Picture and the Purpose
An unexamined picture of yourself may be why an owner with a finished sum can still hear herself quote the lower number, and carrying it to price is the series' own step. The book warns that this is argument, not research, and whether to build the identity or loosen it stays an open verdict.
The picture as a regulator; identity as votes; the law of avoidance; the struggle question; purpose as a filter Anecdotal or weak
Chapter 5: Reading a Result
A bad result read as a verdict on you and a good result read as proof of you are one mistake made twice. Two owners run one playbook through one summer, one goes under through illness and a lost contract, and the book will not say the survivor earned it.
Sampling error; attention costs money or time Well supported
Setback beliefs, in children; fault and responsibility, as a rule for your own next move Mixed
Error as correction; the lift after a win; compounding and lag, read from inside Anecdotal or weak
Chapter 6: Heat
Heat feels like the first clear thought of the week. Fear and wanting both narrow what you can see, so the chapter seeks a gap between feeling and act, and its case for a night's wait is the low cost.
Deal fever; shrinking horizons; the emotional gap; name it to tame it; reading only the upside; the flip to not losing; old material Anecdotal or weak
The prepaid debt itself, as arithmetic Well supported
The customer seat: Chapters 7 to 9
Chapter 7: How a Stranger Decides
A stranger cannot judge your work, so they judge proxies, including ones you never chose. Proxies fail both ways, and on the book's reading the ones that undersell you are the more common fault in an honest firm.
Reciprocation; social proof; liking and authority; anchoring; naming the buyer; the free item as proof Mixed
Borrowed trust; boring basics; contrast, the stack and bonuses; the seller's higher bar; unity; the "because" finding Anecdotal or weak
Chapter 8: Loss, Risk and the Moment of Yes
At the moment of yes a buyer weighs two losses, missing out and being wrong, and an honest business can do most about the second. By analogy from children, pressure may win the yes and supply the reason for it, which leaves nothing of the buyer's own to hold it up.
Loss aversion Well supported
Risk reversal; scarcity and reactance; commitment and consistency Mixed
The early win; soft deadlines; upsell timing; effort and stake; stopping once sold Anecdotal or weak
Chapter 9: The Customer Who Does Nothing
Most of what customers do never reaches a decision, so read silence as a missing one. A default that helps pension members can trap a homeowner, and the difference is who it works for. A harder exit can buy a better number and cost you the means of reading it.
Inertia and defaults, in pension members; removing sludge, in people using government programs Well supported
The same force in your customers; Exit as Easy as Entry Mixed
The noncustomer tiers; fading desire; and, as this book's own argument, undecided customers, why bases leak and why friction feels like retention Anecdotal or weak
The counterparty seat: Chapters 10 and 11
Chapter 10: Being Understood
A strong argument implies the other person was wrong, so a good case is not enough, and listening is work. Nadia rehearses the tools on a strata committee and hears the evening felt like being handled: the tools can display understanding and cannot produce it.
The diagnosis, that loss, framing and fairness shape decisions Well supported
Anchoring Mixed
Aggressive listening; feeling understood, and everything of Voss's built on it; the three defended beliefs Anecdotal or weak
Chapter 11: Reading People, and Moves Made on You
Greene says a first impression is the part people have practised, so let the record outweigh the room, and treat each reading as a forecast you might lose. Cialdini's single defence against a move is watching your own response. Faces and generations are retired, and diagnosis is refused.
The moves built on reciprocation, commitment and scarcity; setback beliefs may move a little, in children Mixed
Track record over charm; the character check and the prediction test; small reliabilities; the warning signs and the defences Anecdotal or weak
The team seat: Chapters 12 to 14
Chapter 12: Why People Give More Than the Job Requires
It opens by listing how little it stands on. You can buy compliance, and you have to earn commitment. Elena's late-night roster email costs her the care her senior casual Mia gave beyond her job, and no number she keeps shows it. That extra means care inside the hours you pay for, so reading this as a way to get free hours crosses the Line. Ask staff only when the answer can still change something.
Commitment and consistency, under the point about pressure Mixed
Fair process as recognition; authority on loan; the need for a reason; delegation and hiring Anecdotal or weak
Chapter 13: Feedback, Failure and Repair
Nearly all the evidence here comes from children and students. Praise what someone did and not what they are, and work in order: the room, the message, the date. Helen walks past one talk for about 100 Saturdays, then finds about half the trouble is hers.
Process praise against person praise, in children; the school result; the person or room check Mixed
Diagnosing in place of consoling; high standards plus the means; avoidance, repair and the defensiveness check Anecdotal or weak
Chapter 14: Envy, Groups and Quiet Politics
Very little sits under this chapter, and it says so. Greene says envy most likely comes from someone close and level, and that yours tends to arrive dressed as a principle. Finish it sure of what is wrong with your partner and you read it the wrong way round.
Pluralistic ignorance, in lab volunteers Mixed
Envy in disguise; group pull; disguised aggression; politics; the argument about mortality Anecdotal or weak
The Line
Every chapter stops at The Line, the place an insight turns into manipulation or blame. The smuggling and publicity tests carry no label: a rule of conduct can be argued for and not replicated. Successful Business Patterns does label the pattern behind the smuggling test, Anecdotal or weak.
- 1The smuggling testCialdini's. A trigger that matches something real is fine, and one imported from outside the situation is smuggling. It looks at the facts.
- 2The publicity testThaler and Sunstein's, from Rawls. Would you defend the design in public? It looks at you, and the book rates it a good test but a weak safeguard, since nobody can force you to take it. A true trigger that passes the smuggling test may still fail here: take a genuine deadline set to reach a tired parent late on a Friday, and ask if you would say aloud what you are doing.
- 3The working testThe series' own judgement, never tested. Would this still be acceptable if they could read your notes? Studying their situation passes. Studying their buttons fails.
A line that was true once. In a thin term Elena pastes "only a few places left" from an old email. Saturday now has room, so it fails the smuggling test, and she takes it out. The term came in thin, and a real owner might have sent the line and never been caught. The series predicts that a mismatch, once found, costs more than the sale wherever the relationship continues, and it says effective is not the same as acceptable.
Half the reason. Nadia's partner Col wants cancellations taken by phone in office hours. He would defend that to anyone, as a way to hear from customers. The rest of it is that some people will not ring, and the publicity test only works if you give all of it.
Standing arguments
Where good advice collides, the series rules. This book is home to 10 of the series' 24 standing arguments, and nobody has tested any of the rulings. Four of them:
- 1Will, room or beliefMaltz says picture it first, Manson says act first, Clear says arrange the setting. The series' own judgement: if the room is yours to change, change it, then make a plan, and look at belief last. Rehearse only specific conduct.
- 2Responsibility or structureManson wants you to own your next move, and Dweck's critics object to moving a problem onto the person. The series' own judgement: responsibility for yourself and structure for everyone else.
- 3Pressure or trustHormozi hands the seller a lever, Cialdini holds that a true limit, stated, is simply information, and neither defends a fake. The series' own judgement: truth first, then repeat and exit, then who decides.
- 4Lock in continuity or make leaving easyHormozi wants recurring income in the first sale, and the library's commentary wants the way out no harder than the way in. The series' own judgement: both, and when they clash, ask whose interest the design serves, and if you would admit it out loud.
Three of the ten stay open or partly open: sincere or tactical, building the identity or loosening it, and whether people can change. Chapter 9 also says it does not know who should decide what customers would endorse.
Who this does not fit
Most of the tactics fit a business like Nadia's, with a single motivated buyer, a short sales cycle and a decent margin, and the book says that tells you something about the sources.
The thin-margin shop. Tony clears about A$7 gross profit on a basket, so he could not pay for most of this, and a field-sized effect from a wording test would probably be lost in the weather.
The committee sale. Helen's work goes through procurement officers and tenders, where a closing deadline read as an insult. One customer holds about 45 per cent of her revenue, and reading that customer perfectly would leave the figure where it is.
Small samples. At about one tender won in five, a run of losses tells Helen little about her estimating. On the biggest decisions, on the book's reading, more trials are no answer, because nobody opens enough second sites to reach a sample.
Who was studied. Pension members, children, students, lab volunteers, therapy patients and the people a few writers remember. Nearly every habit tool assumes you control your time, room and company, which a shift worker, a carer or your own staff may not.
Using this on people. These sources give you no licence to diagnose a colleague or a client. Use the vocabulary in advance, as a prompt to check, and never as an account of what has already happened.
After that the sources run out, with nothing on the psychology of selling up or walking away.
The Australian line
Scarcity. A false claim of limited stock, or a countdown that resets, amounts to misleading or deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law.
Price. If a was/now or comparison figure was never genuine, that is a false representation about price. Invented stack values, the value listed against each item in an offer, are a legal exposure too, and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has pursued this kind of claim.
Cancelling. Cancellation harder than sign-up is under regulatory attention. The book describes the reforms aimed at it as proposed, but that has dated: Parliament passed them on 2 July 2026 and the government says the bans start on 1 July 2027. This update is not from the book, so check the regulator's current guidance.
Employment. Employment law and the awards covering your staff govern hours, rosters, casual work and pay, so check with the Fair Work Ombudsman before changing a roster or asking for extra time. Ending someone's job also falls under employment law, such as unfair dismissal and general protections, which the book leaves out, so before a conversation that could end there, check the process with the Ombudsman or a qualified adviser.
The employment notes are not from the library, and the book says to check them against the regulator's current guidance.
Common questions
Is this therapy, or medical advice?
No. The book says on its first page that it is general information, not psychological or medical advice, and that no tool in it treats depression, anxiety or trauma. Its exercises are private habits for reading a business. If your bad weeks have stopped being about the business, the next step is a GP or a psychologist, and the book can wait. Chapter 6 adds one more thing. If you have started to think the people around you would be better off without you, or you are thinking about harming yourself, treat that as an emergency and contact emergency services or a crisis line today. No book is the right tool for that, including this one.
Can I trust the labels when the library publishes the book?
Trust them less than you would an outside review. The AIEIO Library publishes the series, the same editors set the evidence labels, and the labels rest largely on that one library's judgement, so the finding that dull ideas beat clever ones is partly an editorial pattern. The book counts the library's commentary as a voice that is never independent, and tells you to give its labels the check you would give a consultant's card.
Does any of this work in a small business?
Nobody knows. No source in the book tested any of this in a small business, and nothing in those sources shows that it changes what a small business earns. The strongest real-world record it has is in pensions, which does not show you what will happen at your counter. Its case for most of the practice is cost: use what is cheap and reversible, and promise yourself no particular result.
If a famous number is retired, is the advice beside it wrong?
Not necessarily. The book keeps the two apart. Giving staff a roster change face to face may be exactly right, and it never needed a claim about 93 per cent of communication. A retired claim does not prove its opposite either, so the failure of willpower depletion does not show self-control is limitless. The replication ledger grades claims, and what you do on a wet Monday is still your call.
Do I need Book 1, or any psychology, to read it?
No to both. It stands alone, and it was written for owners, team leaders and anyone whose work involves selling, negotiating or managing. The book describes three ways through: from start to finish, across the series from the question costing you most, or Chapters 1 and 2 for the vocabulary and then the seat that keeps catching you out. Either way, it asks you to read each chapter as being about you first.
About this summary. This is a summary of Successful Business Psychology: The four minds in every business, starting with yours (2026), the second of three books in the AIEIO Library's own Successful Business series, written and narrated for this library. The book is an original work, built by reading the library's summaries of 21 books against each other.
Take the course. The companion course, Successful Business Psychology on course.contact, teaches the same material in 10 modules with a 30-question exam and a completion certificate. The course is free and non-accredited.
Not affiliated. AIEIO is not affiliated with, authorised by, or endorsed by any author, publisher or rights holder named on this page. Book titles and author names are used only to identify the works discussed. The businesses in the book's stories are invented and their figures illustrative. General information only, not legal, financial, medical, psychological or other professional advice, and nothing in it treats depression, anxiety or trauma.
Want a title added to the library? Request a book.